Will paid family leave mean more litigation?
Monday, February 11th, 2008For those of you who have been reading this blog, you understand that the so-called paid family leave being advanced in NJ is not a leave law, per se. Rather, the bill amends the temporary disability law so that employees can receive benefits for up to 6 weeks to care for ill family members.
Proponent’s of the bill mention that employees can still be fired. However, in Delgado v. LA Weight Center’s, Inc. A federal court held that an employee can sue her employer for firing her in retaliation for filing a state disability claim. This decision creates an exception to the at-will discharge rule.
Opponent’s of paid family leave are citing the Delgado case to argue that firing employees who are absent caring for ill family members will lead to frivolus allegations of retaliation, thereby creating a de facto right to reinstatement.
The drafters should seek to limit frivolous litigation and be certain that the bill does nothing to undermine at will employment.


